I recently had these boots resoled and reheeled (a dying art
in a world of fast fashion), and as part of my commitment to make/mend/thrift,
I felt these boots encapsulated a lot of those values as well as some other,
nonsartorial, things.
I’m pretty
sure my mother bought these Robert Clergerie boots for me at Bergdorf Goodman
in 1995/1996. I remember that the
ladyfriend and I were still maintaining separate apartments and more
importantly, separate finances.
For years my
mother and I have had a semi-annual date to go shopping in New York, a
tradition that has lasted into the almost 11 years I’ve been in Hamilton. On each of these trips, my mother buys
something for me. My receptivity to this
has varied over the years. There was a
time when I didn’t want her to buy me anything because I thought it undermined
my independence and sense of adulthood; there was a time when it made me
anxious because I knew she’d feel the
day was a failure if I didn’t have something to show for it; there was the
passive-aggressive phase when I tried to maximize my haul. Over the past twenty or so years, I’ve come
to a more nuanced understanding of this dynamic.
When I played show-and-tell with the ladyfriend the evening
after that shopping trip, I was taken aback by her outright indignation over the
cost of the boots. She didn’t have to
buy them, why should she have any objection?
Her thought was that I didn’t need the boots; I needed the money. Neither of us at the time fully understood
what was at play here between my mother, shopping, and me.
I was defensive.
Stuck uncomfortably between my mother and my ladyfriend, I was also
surprised at how pissed she was. Didn’t
she understand that that was not how it worked?
Couldn’t she appreciate how well these $500 (yes, in 1995/96) boots
would wear? Didn’t she understand that a lot of this had more to do with communicating
affection than amassing physical objects? (Okay, I might not have understood
that then myself.)
Nonetheless, the boots stayed (I don’t think returning them
occurred to me, even if that’d been
an option), and they’ve endured. There
have been years where they were worn infrequently, and I may have thought about
letting them go once or twice, but something has always made me keep them. Maybe it was due to the ladyfriend’s initial
objection; I didn’t want them to turn into the impulse purchase she had characterized
them to be. (This is not to say other
items didn’t fall into that category…)
I got them resoled and reheeled and found they have an
important place not only in my wardrobe but also in my life. The ladyfriend acknowledges now that they’re
a well-made pair of boots worth the cost (while still rightfully maintaining
the fact that I could’ve really used the cash).
They represent how the ladyfriend and I have learned to communicate and
have moved our values and ideas of how things should be closer to one another.
Oh, she was mad back then; she will sometimes mention
it when she sees the boots, but then she adds, “Well, you’ve gotten your
money’s worth out of them.”
I’m not saying that $500 in cash wouldn’t have been more helpful at the time, but these boots have certainly earned their
keep; not only are they still viable and stylish, they gave me an opportunity
to understand a lot of things beyond footwear.
Your 20 year old shoes are gorgeous and well worth the repair. Thank you for a well-written essay. It's worthy of inclusion in a book about material culture and/or fashion.
ReplyDeleteThanks! Glad you liked the essay; I plan on doing more in-depth pieces like this on the blog.
DeleteDo you know these shoes are made near my home town (or at least were) and I owned a few of them (my favorite were "plateform" sandals with 2 large leather bands going all the way down to the sole of the shoe.... I can't believe I used to have a sense of fashion at some point in my Life!!!!). I'll try to find a picture for you!
ReplyDeleteOf course you have a fashion sense! I'm still wearing that Agnes B. jacket you gave me!
Delete